Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bettina Arndt's avatar

Here's an interesting idea - Falsely Accused Day. see here... https://falselyaccusedday.org/.

They are holding demonstrations in a number of UK cities on Sept 9. Maybe we should do likewise? See how they explain what they are doing.

Every year, thousands of innocent men and women are falsely accused of serious criminal offences. In its efforts to ensure justice for genuine victims of horrific crimes, our criminal justice system has dispensed with Due Process and allowed itself to be used by people with malicious intent. Falsely Accused Day is intended to raise awareness of just how easy it is to fall victim to a false accusation, to point out how the Presumption of Innocence has been removed and how the law continues to be eroded in the name of justice.

Expand full comment
"Alan"'s avatar

Hello to anyone reading in on this.

I am the "Alan" described above (Bettina can confirm this).

I'll focus this comment on my own in-person interaction with the CSA (the only interaction actually, it went solely to lawyers afterwards). There are, however, an awful lot of other interactions which cannot be discussed or revealed here.

I really did have an onerously long phone-call with the bureaucrat mentioned in the post (that really was the name he provided, but he outright refused to tell me his full name and astonishingly enough, even what his precise job title/description/role was, I did ask).

It would be very hard indeed to adequately express in a written comment like this just how utterly disdainful and coldly, cruelly indifferent this official was in his dealing with my concerns. I took the precaution of having a very credible third party witness present throughout the interaction (conducted with the speaker on), this third party is eagerly ready to produce a statutory declaration as to the manner and tone of the interaction I suffered, should it be requested or required (however, the audio recording of the call, which will be in the Services Australia database, would of course support my assertion). I do so wish that I also myself had a recording of the entire exchange. Ah well.

The outcome of this interaction was that I essentially became very very angry indeed (very, just in case that wasn't clear) and utterly resolved to fight.

Subsequent to the above horrendous CSA interaction I then contacted Bettina and received a very (very indeed....) useful response which resulted in me emailing directly the CEO of Services Australia (thank you very kindly again Bettina for responding to my plea). I am certain that both the tone and content of my communication will have alerted them (exquisitely) that there was a severe problem that needed to be resolved.

Which, as Bettina wrote above, really was resolved with an almost unseemly haste. There remains a little more legal road to go down however before I can move on from this but the basic essentials are as written in the blog.

A very VERY ironic subscript to all of this horror show is that if the "Owen" mentioned in the blog had just politely and pleasantly said to me that what I was saying was very concerning to him and that he would carefully look into it and then following his scrutiny of the file he confirmed that the "Agency" had made an error and that all my money would be returned immediately and can we please just forget all about it?

Then I would have.

But no...... The "Agency" representative bullied me the way he did.

Unfortunate.

Expand full comment
77 more comments...

No posts