I keep on saying this, FEMINISM IS NOT FOR EVERY ONE, MOST WOMEN AND MEN DON'T LIKE IT, which is understandable, everyone must not partake in it , if you are not a feminist, GOOD FOR YOU, if you are a feminist, BETTER FOR YOU ..
I pretty much cant watch commissioned series now on Netflix, BBC, Apple TV etc. THE MESSAGE is just nauseatingly force fed to us and overtakes plot, entertainment, and immersion.
Sure someone from the U.K. has pointed out that the “Sanctify all women reporting sex assaults” rule does not apply to all cases. Especially, working class mainly white girls raped and barbarically in some cases murdered by industrialised Pakistani rape gangs. No AWFUL compassion for them. Though the feminised DEI driven bureaucracy of police, social work and healthcare were complicit some fearless women confronted it to their cost. The laughably titled “Safeguarding minister for Women and Girls Jess Philips, denied a public enquiry while demanding one into the rape and murder of one middle class white woman.
I am not sure what "restorative justice" is but I doubt it can replace the hundreds years of wisdom of the Common Law. The problem with the feminist jurisprudence overall is that it has no idea what justice is and wants to replace it with a "feeling what is right". The old English law was bloody but it understood human nature very well. Did you know it was a crime to force even a prostitute already in the 13.century ? Henry de Bracton, the Justice of the King's Bench, ruled that the perpetrator has no way of knowing whether a prostitute refusing sex means she is on her way to forsake that unlawful way of life, but (and this is the part I love), "even if that is not the case, the Law of England does not think so hardly of offenders as to deny them retreat even from a common strumpet". Men and women always knew what is and what is not rape and how to deal with it in a way that protected women from it. The feminist overwrought drama around rape never helped a living soul. It only creates fear and loathing of men.
This is a narrative popping up in the states with Cesar Chavez who has been dead for 30 plus years right now & it is also election 🗳️ time here so it is odd.
Packed with consistent analysis, wise deliberation and testing of reality, Bettina has given yet another seriously valuable contribution to the public discussion of a serious contemporary issue.
99% of all domestic spousal abuse is a case of two idiots fighting, and the weaker idiot losing.
80 % of all rape accusations are false. They are either retracted or disproven in court.
The vast majority of REAL violence against women involve women involved with prostitution and/or drugs. And it’s harsh but true: most of them get what they deserve.
At this point i actively enjoy and savour the anger of feminists and their misery pleases me. They deserve it.
Actually I do think that any woman who makes a false accusation of rape should face trial. However the reason I am in favour of men beating the shit out of rapists is that sometimes men need to correct the behaviour of other men, rather than leaving women to deal with it.
Why would you “beat the shit out of a man” just because some female lied to you? I think in that situation it should be YOU that gets the shit beaten out of, I’m glad you agree.
Because we have a legal system. But interesting that you seem more in favour of beating women who make false accusations of rape but completely ignore rapists.
If he was drunk, wasn't he the one who was not capable of giving consent, according to common feminist logic? Wasn't he the actual victim of sexual assault?
The reporting about Epstein and the virtual lack of any reference to the part played in it by many women, is bizarre but predictable. Roberts herself reported that she was paid $15,000 to go to see Andrew in London. Loads of women/girls were well paid by Epstein for their services. Many returned time and time again. They were coerced by money. Lots of it.
And there were the many women who were well paid to recruit others into service.
By the way all of this is based on their own testimony.
They are allowed to present themselves as victims. Talk about lack of agency.
Maxwell must wonder why only her? On the basis of what is alleged there should be dozens of other women in Jail.
I keep on saying this, FEMINISM IS NOT FOR EVERY ONE, MOST WOMEN AND MEN DON'T LIKE IT, which is understandable, everyone must not partake in it , if you are not a feminist, GOOD FOR YOU, if you are a feminist, BETTER FOR YOU ..
Which women have being going through for years,now they can't take it back 😭…
I pretty much cant watch commissioned series now on Netflix, BBC, Apple TV etc. THE MESSAGE is just nauseatingly force fed to us and overtakes plot, entertainment, and immersion.
Sure someone from the U.K. has pointed out that the “Sanctify all women reporting sex assaults” rule does not apply to all cases. Especially, working class mainly white girls raped and barbarically in some cases murdered by industrialised Pakistani rape gangs. No AWFUL compassion for them. Though the feminised DEI driven bureaucracy of police, social work and healthcare were complicit some fearless women confronted it to their cost. The laughably titled “Safeguarding minister for Women and Girls Jess Philips, denied a public enquiry while demanding one into the rape and murder of one middle class white woman.
Most TV is unwatchable. Feminism ideology, woke ideology.....just can't watch. The Pitt, is no different.
I am not sure what "restorative justice" is but I doubt it can replace the hundreds years of wisdom of the Common Law. The problem with the feminist jurisprudence overall is that it has no idea what justice is and wants to replace it with a "feeling what is right". The old English law was bloody but it understood human nature very well. Did you know it was a crime to force even a prostitute already in the 13.century ? Henry de Bracton, the Justice of the King's Bench, ruled that the perpetrator has no way of knowing whether a prostitute refusing sex means she is on her way to forsake that unlawful way of life, but (and this is the part I love), "even if that is not the case, the Law of England does not think so hardly of offenders as to deny them retreat even from a common strumpet". Men and women always knew what is and what is not rape and how to deal with it in a way that protected women from it. The feminist overwrought drama around rape never helped a living soul. It only creates fear and loathing of men.
This is a narrative popping up in the states with Cesar Chavez who has been dead for 30 plus years right now & it is also election 🗳️ time here so it is odd.
Packed with consistent analysis, wise deliberation and testing of reality, Bettina has given yet another seriously valuable contribution to the public discussion of a serious contemporary issue.
99% of all domestic spousal abuse is a case of two idiots fighting, and the weaker idiot losing.
80 % of all rape accusations are false. They are either retracted or disproven in court.
The vast majority of REAL violence against women involve women involved with prostitution and/or drugs. And it’s harsh but true: most of them get what they deserve.
At this point i actively enjoy and savour the anger of feminists and their misery pleases me. They deserve it.
Feminism, AI, Social Media, Anti-Racism (the business)
The 4 horsewomen of the apocalypse.
Too often these days, rape means I was too drunk to really enjoy it the night before. Regret is not rape. No wonder juries are throwing so many out.
Actually I do think that any woman who makes a false accusation of rape should face trial. However the reason I am in favour of men beating the shit out of rapists is that sometimes men need to correct the behaviour of other men, rather than leaving women to deal with it.
Why would you “beat the shit out of a man” just because some female lied to you? I think in that situation it should be YOU that gets the shit beaten out of, I’m glad you agree.
I said that rapists should have the shit beaten out of them. Women who lie about rape should face prosecution.
Why don’t we just “beat the shit out of her” as well? If we agree the false accuser should get the same sentence?
Because we have a legal system. But interesting that you seem more in favour of beating women who make false accusations of rape but completely ignore rapists.
How is it EXACTLY that I i “ignore rapists” when you don’t have the slightest clue about me??
You seem to be more interested in punishing women who make false accusations of rape than wanting to punish rapists.
If he was drunk, wasn't he the one who was not capable of giving consent, according to common feminist logic? Wasn't he the actual victim of sexual assault?
Was my experience, described here...
https://estwald397.substack.com/p/dog-days#:~:text=an%20abusive%20situation.-,HIT%20AND%20RUN,-I%20was%20half
...more traumatic, less traumatic, or equally traumatic than the sexual assault depicted in The Pitt?
The reporting about Epstein and the virtual lack of any reference to the part played in it by many women, is bizarre but predictable. Roberts herself reported that she was paid $15,000 to go to see Andrew in London. Loads of women/girls were well paid by Epstein for their services. Many returned time and time again. They were coerced by money. Lots of it.
And there were the many women who were well paid to recruit others into service.
By the way all of this is based on their own testimony.
They are allowed to present themselves as victims. Talk about lack of agency.
Maxwell must wonder why only her? On the basis of what is alleged there should be dozens of other women in Jail.
I don't even watch TV anymore. Too many commercials and nothing but leftist prop propaganda.