Just wanted to let you all know that I have persuaded "Peter," the man who features in the case I wrote about this week, to join this discussion. He's commenting under "notreallypeter" and will be checking in on our discussion on and off in the next few days. Perhaps you would like to ask him specific questions about his ordeal?
What are the odds there was video evidence. That strike of luck, means in the same circumstances a man could spend a decade in prison... at least name the Dr so we can all avoid the pill heads practice/ hospital?
NotreallyPeter is lucky that he had the foresight to get it on video as this no doubt helped the jury decide. But that in itself could be called sexual assault, some years ago in WA a man was charged and convicted of sexual assault for secretly filming himself and girlfriend having sex.
The girlfriend later found the video tape in a drawer and went to police, this was very unfair as the man had no intention of selling the film or using it against the woman.
Bettina a couple of years ago a women falsely accuse her partner of dv.
She was the woman who was caught on video in a lift punching her in the face on the way to report her partner for dv. Do you know if she faced any consequences?
It is almost 30 years ago when I first read "Not Guilty In defense of the Modern Man" by David Thomas and I have recently started rereading this book, and much of what he wrote about still exists today. Neil Lyndon author of "No More Sex War" in his article "Return of the Heretic" wrote about his experiences in being cancelled and ostracised.
Below is a conversation I had with my then wife in 2014, she had run out of the Tramadol she was talking daily as an appetite suppressant and the euphoric feeling it gave her. When she ran out she would have shakes and sweats and become rather irritable, In this exchange she offered to write me a script for sleeping tables while clearly self prescribing herself Tramadol and offerreing so have sex with me at westmead children's hospitals, on call room in return for expoditing the drugs to her as she was withdrawing. In court,she denied prescibing Tramadol to me.
WIFE, aka facebook user - Can u check my bedside chest and see if there's a script for tramadol?
I ran out and I don't think I'll make shops after work
•
8/28, 6:05pm
NOTREALLY PETER
No script
•
8/28, 6:05pm
Facebook User
Top and bottom drawer?
•
8/28, 6:06pm
NOTREALLY PETER
Yeah
•
8/28, 6:06pm
Facebook User
Saw it in there the other day
In a folded card
Typed printed version
Folded in half
•
8/28, 6:12pm
NOTREALLY PETER
Two scripts
One for yaz
And one for ointment
•
8/28, 6:22pm
Facebook User
Shit
•
8/28, 6:33pm
Facebook User
Ok got a hospital script. Want me to write u one for sleepy tabs as well
Great article Bettina, this case reminds me of the case of the late Kevin Ibbs in WA 1988, he was called the 30 second rapist because the woman he was having consenting sex with wanted to stop the intercourse, she timed it well as Kevin was not able to stop and continued for 30seconds.
Most people thought this was some sort of joke that he was even charged and it was controversial at the time but he was found guilty and jailed.
The court " found" that he should have stopped the sex when asked and as such the rape charge was proven.
Kevin always said his was a " test case" and he might have been right. The same question comes up " why do police and prosecutors continue with cases like these? " when it must be clear after first investigation that the case is very weak.
Police often use the old excuse for NOT prosecuting of not having enough evidence to win , but this does not seem to make a difference in rape cases , they go head and make up the shortfall in evidence with lies and corruption.
It is clear that political pressure has been put on police forces in this country and it must be stopped
The fight for men's right is unfortunately also fight against peace and abundance. A man's value is his ability to die or work to death, when neither is in demand, then it is women that is valued by society. They more women are comfortable and supported by the "system", the more they will be willing to procreate which inadvertently creates more tax payers.
I once thought being a police officer was an honourable career to chose, I don’t anymore. Police are now doing the dirty work for the government of the day. In Queensland we have our state run by a female Labor Premier, we have also a female Police Commissioner who once worked as a Fire Chief. There is now a push on to bring coercive control into Legislation, if successful anyone found guilty could have a 14 year jail term. I know of men wanting their partners to stop spending money on alcohol or gambling at the sports club, etc. This now will viewed as coercive control. There is a agenda going on in Queensland at the moment, I see magistrates give men extreme sentences after the partner cries domestic violence and yet recently a female run over her ex partner and his current girlfriend and was given immediate bail.Men are being denied bail by the courts, police are fabricating evidence to keep men locked up. I have seen Prosecutors lie in court and con magistrates. Only a couple of days ago a police officer lied to the courts and two men were denied bail, they spent two years in jail and now there charges were dropped because of no evidence. This police officer is under investigation, I know he will keep his job.
I know of a woman who works for government in Child Safety and Vulnerable Women Dept of QLD Government and she was overhead coaching a woman on how to do everything to get her partner thrown out of their home by police. In Queensland 40% of calls to police are from women claiming to be victims of domestic violence. I can’t believe that every call is genuine, it’s just they know how to play the system. I have a very jaded opinion of women claiming domestic violence and I certainly would not go to the assistance of a woman wanting help. I have seen how manipulative and dishonest they can be and how the government and police encourage them.
Not really Peter, I truly know what you are going through, my family are going through the very same thing at the moment. It is pure evil what these women do.
It is a new form of sexism to place women on a higher level than males - a reworking of the female on a pedestal which was common in the patriarchal age. How little we humans change.
Men are particularly vulnerable, in my view, because women are by their nature more considered and calculating in the sexual arena, for good and for ill.
The historical belief was that women were innocents, which really meant cretins or childlike, and therefore if any sexual encounter took place, it was the fault of the male. One would have thought we left that sexist fantasy behind long ago but it seems not. Human evolution is nothing if not slow.
Thank you Bettina. This is such an important issue and I can't believe how long it has been going on. Women who lie have to be punished and it is ridiculous to say that the genuine cases will not come forward. Liars are hurting the genuine cases by being so numerous. And the men these women lie about are the real victims who should have some protection.
My husband and I have friends who have been accused of child abuse so the mother can get custody. It is frighteningly common for women to lie in court and the system to encourage it.
I appreciate all you wrote but especially your comment about all those 'wrongly accused fathers, deliberately alienated from their children' as it affects my own family. Thank you again for your sane voice in an increasingly crazy world.
Bettina, I've loved pretty much everything you've written for decades now, and especially all those years ago when you were part of the libertarian feminist critique of cultural feminism. Wasn't that a shining hour for the left-of-centre mainstream press to publish you back then!
When I opened your blog and saw its title: "Evil Genius at Work" and then the accompanying graphic, I immediately thought you might be giving us your thoughts on Krazy Klaus and transhumanist sex, whatever that might amount to, because the figures in the graphic did look decidedly less than real humans, I'm sure you'll agree. And if anyone was going to give us the real inside poop on transhumanist sex, I'd want to hear it from you.
By the time I realised it was just a fairly lame graphic, I was already on the job imagining as you asked the reader to do. My imagination threw up two insights: because of the absence of any truly sensual engagement in the graphic, it seemed to me to stand as some sort of monument to the death of really enthusiastic sex in the brave new world of "enthusiastic" consent; and when I imagined a bit more, I thought I could almost hear the woman figure saying: "You know, I'd rather be humping my pillow than this poor, sleeping bag of a man. And whoever gave me this cute ponytail, why didn't they put me in a position where, at the very least, a man might take me by surprise and excite me by giving my ponytail a really nice pull?"
There's nothing I can add to your mastery of the subject of lying women riding roughshod over our broken legal system, so I'd just like to mention in passing that recent incident regarding now deceased Labor senator Kimberley Kitching and the three Labor "mean girls".
Obviously, at least one woman or as many as three are lying. What's certain is they can't all be telling the truth. So, there's a conundrum for you. You would think the feminists would stay true to form and side with the woman making the allegation. But no-one did their usual Krakatoa panto act. Then it just seemed as if the Labor Party waved their collective wands and all of a sudden there was nothing to see. And there wasn't. Pure magic.
The adversarial feminist movement’s leveraging of both the judiciary and parliament has been malicious and effective, but cannot be sustained long term.
As history has repeatedly shown, any social or political ideology that is built on a foundation of misdirection and untruths, and ultimately manifests in injustice, will eventually be exposed, forcing reform and a realignment of values.
While there is a vocal chattering class of woke idealists who are intent on tearing society apart using catalysts such as gender and race, mainstream society still has a fundamental sense of justice. What is lacking is any real awareness of the truth.
For as long as digital and mainstream media continue to project a cultivated woke narrative, and our political leaders fail to stand up for what is right, little will change, and public awareness will remain low of the injustice that is inflicted on men by a judiciary that should be protecting them, and the propensity of aggrieved women to lie in order to inflict petty revenge and malice.
Something I would also like to know is why the OIC (officer in charge) decided it was permissible to send my credit card information, (three of them) to my ex wife, he also provided her with a letter that she took to my bank, in an attempt to gain my then current financial information. None of this was relevant to any changes however we were selling a house at the time. The actions of the police were utterly repugnant.
What saddens me is the silence of fair-minded women, the mothers of the men you are defending - just look at the gender bias of the comments below. Don't women get your news letters?
Just wanted to let you all know that I have persuaded "Peter," the man who features in the case I wrote about this week, to join this discussion. He's commenting under "notreallypeter" and will be checking in on our discussion on and off in the next few days. Perhaps you would like to ask him specific questions about his ordeal?
What are the odds there was video evidence. That strike of luck, means in the same circumstances a man could spend a decade in prison... at least name the Dr so we can all avoid the pill heads practice/ hospital?
NotreallyPeter is lucky that he had the foresight to get it on video as this no doubt helped the jury decide. But that in itself could be called sexual assault, some years ago in WA a man was charged and convicted of sexual assault for secretly filming himself and girlfriend having sex.
The girlfriend later found the video tape in a drawer and went to police, this was very unfair as the man had no intention of selling the film or using it against the woman.
Bettina a couple of years ago a women falsely accuse her partner of dv.
She was the woman who was caught on video in a lift punching her in the face on the way to report her partner for dv. Do you know if she faced any consequences?
It is almost 30 years ago when I first read "Not Guilty In defense of the Modern Man" by David Thomas and I have recently started rereading this book, and much of what he wrote about still exists today. Neil Lyndon author of "No More Sex War" in his article "Return of the Heretic" wrote about his experiences in being cancelled and ostracised.
Below is a conversation I had with my then wife in 2014, she had run out of the Tramadol she was talking daily as an appetite suppressant and the euphoric feeling it gave her. When she ran out she would have shakes and sweats and become rather irritable, In this exchange she offered to write me a script for sleeping tables while clearly self prescribing herself Tramadol and offerreing so have sex with me at westmead children's hospitals, on call room in return for expoditing the drugs to her as she was withdrawing. In court,she denied prescibing Tramadol to me.
WIFE, aka facebook user - Can u check my bedside chest and see if there's a script for tramadol?
I ran out and I don't think I'll make shops after work
•
8/28, 6:05pm
NOTREALLY PETER
No script
•
8/28, 6:05pm
Facebook User
Top and bottom drawer?
•
8/28, 6:06pm
NOTREALLY PETER
Yeah
•
8/28, 6:06pm
Facebook User
Saw it in there the other day
In a folded card
Typed printed version
Folded in half
•
8/28, 6:12pm
NOTREALLY PETER
Two scripts
One for yaz
And one for ointment
•
8/28, 6:22pm
Facebook User
Shit
•
8/28, 6:33pm
Facebook User
Ok got a hospital script. Want me to write u one for sleepy tabs as well
Have u run out?
•
8/28, 6:38pm
NOTREALLY PETER
Ok yeah thanks
U gonna email it to me?
•
8/28, 6:39pm
Facebook User
Don't think I can...will have to speed home
•
8/28, 6:41pm
NOTREALLY PETER
Email it to me and I'll print it of
•
8/28, 7:02pm
NOTREALLY PETER
Or I take it in in the morning
•
8/28, 7:17pm
Facebook User
But then how do u get it to me?
Sexy time in the on call room?
Great article Bettina, this case reminds me of the case of the late Kevin Ibbs in WA 1988, he was called the 30 second rapist because the woman he was having consenting sex with wanted to stop the intercourse, she timed it well as Kevin was not able to stop and continued for 30seconds.
Most people thought this was some sort of joke that he was even charged and it was controversial at the time but he was found guilty and jailed.
The court " found" that he should have stopped the sex when asked and as such the rape charge was proven.
Kevin always said his was a " test case" and he might have been right. The same question comes up " why do police and prosecutors continue with cases like these? " when it must be clear after first investigation that the case is very weak.
Police often use the old excuse for NOT prosecuting of not having enough evidence to win , but this does not seem to make a difference in rape cases , they go head and make up the shortfall in evidence with lies and corruption.
It is clear that political pressure has been put on police forces in this country and it must be stopped
The fight for men's right is unfortunately also fight against peace and abundance. A man's value is his ability to die or work to death, when neither is in demand, then it is women that is valued by society. They more women are comfortable and supported by the "system", the more they will be willing to procreate which inadvertently creates more tax payers.
I once thought being a police officer was an honourable career to chose, I don’t anymore. Police are now doing the dirty work for the government of the day. In Queensland we have our state run by a female Labor Premier, we have also a female Police Commissioner who once worked as a Fire Chief. There is now a push on to bring coercive control into Legislation, if successful anyone found guilty could have a 14 year jail term. I know of men wanting their partners to stop spending money on alcohol or gambling at the sports club, etc. This now will viewed as coercive control. There is a agenda going on in Queensland at the moment, I see magistrates give men extreme sentences after the partner cries domestic violence and yet recently a female run over her ex partner and his current girlfriend and was given immediate bail.Men are being denied bail by the courts, police are fabricating evidence to keep men locked up. I have seen Prosecutors lie in court and con magistrates. Only a couple of days ago a police officer lied to the courts and two men were denied bail, they spent two years in jail and now there charges were dropped because of no evidence. This police officer is under investigation, I know he will keep his job.
I know of a woman who works for government in Child Safety and Vulnerable Women Dept of QLD Government and she was overhead coaching a woman on how to do everything to get her partner thrown out of their home by police. In Queensland 40% of calls to police are from women claiming to be victims of domestic violence. I can’t believe that every call is genuine, it’s just they know how to play the system. I have a very jaded opinion of women claiming domestic violence and I certainly would not go to the assistance of a woman wanting help. I have seen how manipulative and dishonest they can be and how the government and police encourage them.
Not really Peter, I truly know what you are going through, my family are going through the very same thing at the moment. It is pure evil what these women do.
It is a new form of sexism to place women on a higher level than males - a reworking of the female on a pedestal which was common in the patriarchal age. How little we humans change.
Men are particularly vulnerable, in my view, because women are by their nature more considered and calculating in the sexual arena, for good and for ill.
The historical belief was that women were innocents, which really meant cretins or childlike, and therefore if any sexual encounter took place, it was the fault of the male. One would have thought we left that sexist fantasy behind long ago but it seems not. Human evolution is nothing if not slow.
Thank you Bettina. This is such an important issue and I can't believe how long it has been going on. Women who lie have to be punished and it is ridiculous to say that the genuine cases will not come forward. Liars are hurting the genuine cases by being so numerous. And the men these women lie about are the real victims who should have some protection.
My husband and I have friends who have been accused of child abuse so the mother can get custody. It is frighteningly common for women to lie in court and the system to encourage it.
I appreciate all you wrote but especially your comment about all those 'wrongly accused fathers, deliberately alienated from their children' as it affects my own family. Thank you again for your sane voice in an increasingly crazy world.
Bettina, I've loved pretty much everything you've written for decades now, and especially all those years ago when you were part of the libertarian feminist critique of cultural feminism. Wasn't that a shining hour for the left-of-centre mainstream press to publish you back then!
When I opened your blog and saw its title: "Evil Genius at Work" and then the accompanying graphic, I immediately thought you might be giving us your thoughts on Krazy Klaus and transhumanist sex, whatever that might amount to, because the figures in the graphic did look decidedly less than real humans, I'm sure you'll agree. And if anyone was going to give us the real inside poop on transhumanist sex, I'd want to hear it from you.
By the time I realised it was just a fairly lame graphic, I was already on the job imagining as you asked the reader to do. My imagination threw up two insights: because of the absence of any truly sensual engagement in the graphic, it seemed to me to stand as some sort of monument to the death of really enthusiastic sex in the brave new world of "enthusiastic" consent; and when I imagined a bit more, I thought I could almost hear the woman figure saying: "You know, I'd rather be humping my pillow than this poor, sleeping bag of a man. And whoever gave me this cute ponytail, why didn't they put me in a position where, at the very least, a man might take me by surprise and excite me by giving my ponytail a really nice pull?"
There's nothing I can add to your mastery of the subject of lying women riding roughshod over our broken legal system, so I'd just like to mention in passing that recent incident regarding now deceased Labor senator Kimberley Kitching and the three Labor "mean girls".
Obviously, at least one woman or as many as three are lying. What's certain is they can't all be telling the truth. So, there's a conundrum for you. You would think the feminists would stay true to form and side with the woman making the allegation. But no-one did their usual Krakatoa panto act. Then it just seemed as if the Labor Party waved their collective wands and all of a sudden there was nothing to see. And there wasn't. Pure magic.
The adversarial feminist movement’s leveraging of both the judiciary and parliament has been malicious and effective, but cannot be sustained long term.
As history has repeatedly shown, any social or political ideology that is built on a foundation of misdirection and untruths, and ultimately manifests in injustice, will eventually be exposed, forcing reform and a realignment of values.
While there is a vocal chattering class of woke idealists who are intent on tearing society apart using catalysts such as gender and race, mainstream society still has a fundamental sense of justice. What is lacking is any real awareness of the truth.
For as long as digital and mainstream media continue to project a cultivated woke narrative, and our political leaders fail to stand up for what is right, little will change, and public awareness will remain low of the injustice that is inflicted on men by a judiciary that should be protecting them, and the propensity of aggrieved women to lie in order to inflict petty revenge and malice.
Something I would also like to know is why the OIC (officer in charge) decided it was permissible to send my credit card information, (three of them) to my ex wife, he also provided her with a letter that she took to my bank, in an attempt to gain my then current financial information. None of this was relevant to any changes however we were selling a house at the time. The actions of the police were utterly repugnant.
Forgery is a crime when she forged prescriptions for a narcotic opiod.
Falsely obtaining controlled drugs is a crime.
Perjury is a crime.
Which of them is going to be prosecuted?
What saddens me is the silence of fair-minded women, the mothers of the men you are defending - just look at the gender bias of the comments below. Don't women get your news letters?