Australia has become a country where we’re totally over governed by a handful of extremists and there is very little we can do about it as our country is governed by the Deep State and our population has lost control! It’s a lawyer’s paradise, money for jam and our Judiciary is corrupt! Think I am wrong? Go to
YouTube/whentheftislegal Australia’s Dirty little secret
"Attorney-General Dreyfus, who has shown great enthusiasm for tilting the scales of justice against men – the Family Law Bill being a case in point". Isn't he a male? Does he not realise that these policies can affect him too, as well as his married (with children) male mates? How short-sighted and brainwashed are some of these male politicians?
Some years ago I [47 YO male] worked as a specialist consultant assigned to an early intervention program for children with developmental issues. My two female colleagues in the program knew that some of the matrons in the organisation didn't want a man working in their field, i.e. children were women's business not men's. Thus my two colleagues made a point of always keeping me in their sight so no false accusations could be made. Never-the-less I was suddenly accused by several women social workers of various issues: being rough, being ignorant of good practice, upsetting the parents who were said to 'hate me', and so on. I was defamed at the highest level in the state government department which employed me as specialist in autism and behaviour. One of the women conspirators repeated the defamatory comments to a meeting of parents with whose children I was working. The regional manager ordered me removed from the early education program without any investigation. I responded by using public service procedures to request clarification of the 'charges'. To my delight the senior public servant who defamed me in the department wrote in detail to my manager what she had stated in an executive meeting. My lawyer was equally delighted to have her defamation in a signed document, and I threatened legal action. In the meantime the parents wrote to the relevant Minister complaining that they needed and wanted my expertise. The Minister queried why I was dismissed. Minsterial attention clearly focused the attention of the regional manager. An in-house investigation occurred and I was exonerated. I have the written retraction/apology from one of the women in my drawer still. Another of the conspirators was formally reprimanded and later dismissed. The third woman who started the defamation, but did not speak against me publicly, suffered no direct consequence, but her role was known and she was never trusted after that. Needless to say I have never trusted women, especially social workers since.
Kate Jenkins says that sexual harassment and discrimination are “ unlawful” but who says so and why should they be ?
Discrimination is a valid process ,a right in a democracy , people should be free to discriminate in any way even in regards to who they associate with and in the case of employers ,who the employ.
And sexual harassment these days could be as trivial as a man looking at a provocatively dressed woman or making a comment about her appearance.
One year of Albo’s government-for-women has gone even worse than I expected. I shudder to think how much more damage they’ll do.
It’s always the same formula....
Cook up a study which shows “alarming” female victimhood in some area. Ignore the male victims who meet the same convoluted definition. Then attribute the problem to gender inequality. Enact legislation and allocate spending to “stop it at the start”. Claim to be making a better society. Who can be against making a better society?
Great piece on the misandrist virus and its high priestesses.
As always these misandrist women greatly overestimate their intelligence, and never seem to think through the consequences of their deranged junk philosophies.
The main one being that their poison, far from helping women, will more likely harm them.
For example, organisations not infected with the misandrist virus will become far more reluctant to hire women who are perceived as too high a risk. It may not be fair, but it's inevitable. In fact, I can assure you that this is already happening and will only intensify.
Also, organisations that are infected with the virus will inevitably become weaker. Why? Because talented men (and women) always have choices - and will leave places that don't value their talent. Once the talent starts walking out, the organisation itself weakens. Weaker organisations tend to lay people off - especially women. Again, this is happening right now and has been for some time.
Bottom line : if an organisation decides to value misandry over meritocracy, it must understand that unintended consequences will flow that may prove to be highly damaging to any workplace and in my view, will impact on women the most.
I experienced the following at work, some years ago. I was in a meeting with other senior managers and our boss. They were all women, I not. During the small talk, the conversation swung to physical (pre-bedroom) aspects of the bosses and her husband's behaviour. The two other women chimed in enthusiastically. As I was sitting there, I wondered what would be the outcome if the sexes had been reversed. One woman, three men? It did pass my mind to make a formal complaint, but I quite liked my fellow managers, although our boss was Ms Control and quite unpleasant to work with as a consequence. She also didn't like her wrong-headed 'I'm an ex [big 6] consultant' ideas contradicted...even when they broke accounting standards. I didn't complain as I didn't want to put my two colleagues through that process as their and my work lives would have been so severely affected that I would probably have to leave.
Maybe Dreyfus should be self employed! No chance of that- he'd have a huge super paid by tax payers. Until Michaelia Cash actually votes against one of these suggestions, she's just a bleating voice. Janet Albrechtsen hits the nail on the head, she should have called it "go away to France" subsidized by the government. Gone is the productive country when we have more people being paid to not work "on their perceived or dreamed up fear" & the rest of them on committees deciding how women deserve to be the best paid with the least amount of work. When the world is only females parenting the few babies born to these same sex couples, the academics will then set about to undo what they are now legislating to implement. Meanwhile the males will be cycling around the world, or surfing every day. Self employed for sure. Huge thank you to Bettina!
Government note: Although this sort of misandry will probably not attract a huge number of extra votes of women, but it will certainly result in the loss pf a huge number of men's votes. Do the maths.
Australia has become a country where we’re totally over governed by a handful of extremists and there is very little we can do about it as our country is governed by the Deep State and our population has lost control! It’s a lawyer’s paradise, money for jam and our Judiciary is corrupt! Think I am wrong? Go to
YouTube/whentheftislegal Australia’s Dirty little secret
I would like to read the Hansards debates. Could you please send them to me.
Perhaps it is time for Aussie men to stop maintaining their societies infrastructure and begin immigrating out of Australia to other nations.
"Attorney-General Dreyfus, who has shown great enthusiasm for tilting the scales of justice against men – the Family Law Bill being a case in point". Isn't he a male? Does he not realise that these policies can affect him too, as well as his married (with children) male mates? How short-sighted and brainwashed are some of these male politicians?
"Road to Heterophobia" and "Heterophobia" by Professor Daphne Patai are interesting reading and the scariest part is when will all this ever end?
Some years ago I [47 YO male] worked as a specialist consultant assigned to an early intervention program for children with developmental issues. My two female colleagues in the program knew that some of the matrons in the organisation didn't want a man working in their field, i.e. children were women's business not men's. Thus my two colleagues made a point of always keeping me in their sight so no false accusations could be made. Never-the-less I was suddenly accused by several women social workers of various issues: being rough, being ignorant of good practice, upsetting the parents who were said to 'hate me', and so on. I was defamed at the highest level in the state government department which employed me as specialist in autism and behaviour. One of the women conspirators repeated the defamatory comments to a meeting of parents with whose children I was working. The regional manager ordered me removed from the early education program without any investigation. I responded by using public service procedures to request clarification of the 'charges'. To my delight the senior public servant who defamed me in the department wrote in detail to my manager what she had stated in an executive meeting. My lawyer was equally delighted to have her defamation in a signed document, and I threatened legal action. In the meantime the parents wrote to the relevant Minister complaining that they needed and wanted my expertise. The Minister queried why I was dismissed. Minsterial attention clearly focused the attention of the regional manager. An in-house investigation occurred and I was exonerated. I have the written retraction/apology from one of the women in my drawer still. Another of the conspirators was formally reprimanded and later dismissed. The third woman who started the defamation, but did not speak against me publicly, suffered no direct consequence, but her role was known and she was never trusted after that. Needless to say I have never trusted women, especially social workers since.
Hi, Ken
Sad story.
Do you know how the man was prevented from taking civil action over the false allegations?
Was it the 11 year old girl’s age?
In news to hand, it turns out that male & female dung beetles can work together on a task: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/jan/17/male-and-female-dung-beetles-coordinate-to-roll-balls-researchers-find
Sad that humans are losing that ability.
Kate Jenkins says that sexual harassment and discrimination are “ unlawful” but who says so and why should they be ?
Discrimination is a valid process ,a right in a democracy , people should be free to discriminate in any way even in regards to who they associate with and in the case of employers ,who the employ.
And sexual harassment these days could be as trivial as a man looking at a provocatively dressed woman or making a comment about her appearance.
Its no coincidence Slator and Gorden are one of the biggest ALP donors... they're getting their money's worth.
One year of Albo’s government-for-women has gone even worse than I expected. I shudder to think how much more damage they’ll do.
It’s always the same formula....
Cook up a study which shows “alarming” female victimhood in some area. Ignore the male victims who meet the same convoluted definition. Then attribute the problem to gender inequality. Enact legislation and allocate spending to “stop it at the start”. Claim to be making a better society. Who can be against making a better society?
Great piece on the misandrist virus and its high priestesses.
As always these misandrist women greatly overestimate their intelligence, and never seem to think through the consequences of their deranged junk philosophies.
The main one being that their poison, far from helping women, will more likely harm them.
For example, organisations not infected with the misandrist virus will become far more reluctant to hire women who are perceived as too high a risk. It may not be fair, but it's inevitable. In fact, I can assure you that this is already happening and will only intensify.
Also, organisations that are infected with the virus will inevitably become weaker. Why? Because talented men (and women) always have choices - and will leave places that don't value their talent. Once the talent starts walking out, the organisation itself weakens. Weaker organisations tend to lay people off - especially women. Again, this is happening right now and has been for some time.
Bottom line : if an organisation decides to value misandry over meritocracy, it must understand that unintended consequences will flow that may prove to be highly damaging to any workplace and in my view, will impact on women the most.
I experienced the following at work, some years ago. I was in a meeting with other senior managers and our boss. They were all women, I not. During the small talk, the conversation swung to physical (pre-bedroom) aspects of the bosses and her husband's behaviour. The two other women chimed in enthusiastically. As I was sitting there, I wondered what would be the outcome if the sexes had been reversed. One woman, three men? It did pass my mind to make a formal complaint, but I quite liked my fellow managers, although our boss was Ms Control and quite unpleasant to work with as a consequence. She also didn't like her wrong-headed 'I'm an ex [big 6] consultant' ideas contradicted...even when they broke accounting standards. I didn't complain as I didn't want to put my two colleagues through that process as their and my work lives would have been so severely affected that I would probably have to leave.
As usual I agree with everything you say but it is so depressing I almost wish I hadn't read it.
Maybe Dreyfus should be self employed! No chance of that- he'd have a huge super paid by tax payers. Until Michaelia Cash actually votes against one of these suggestions, she's just a bleating voice. Janet Albrechtsen hits the nail on the head, she should have called it "go away to France" subsidized by the government. Gone is the productive country when we have more people being paid to not work "on their perceived or dreamed up fear" & the rest of them on committees deciding how women deserve to be the best paid with the least amount of work. When the world is only females parenting the few babies born to these same sex couples, the academics will then set about to undo what they are now legislating to implement. Meanwhile the males will be cycling around the world, or surfing every day. Self employed for sure. Huge thank you to Bettina!
Government note: Although this sort of misandry will probably not attract a huge number of extra votes of women, but it will certainly result in the loss pf a huge number of men's votes. Do the maths.