That nonsense has been around the US for at least a couple of decades. The upshot? Claimant #1 is clear-headed, concise and believable; ergo, believe her. Claimant #2 is evasive, doesn't make eye-contact, often changes her story and has no physical evidence to corroborate her story; ergo, believe her. Simple; all rape claimants are to be…
That nonsense has been around the US for at least a couple of decades. The upshot? Claimant #1 is clear-headed, concise and believable; ergo, believe her. Claimant #2 is evasive, doesn't make eye-contact, often changes her story and has no physical evidence to corroborate her story; ergo, believe her. Simple; all rape claimants are to be believed, making exoneration of even the most innocent defendant all but impossible. The point all along.
That nonsense has been around the US for at least a couple of decades. The upshot? Claimant #1 is clear-headed, concise and believable; ergo, believe her. Claimant #2 is evasive, doesn't make eye-contact, often changes her story and has no physical evidence to corroborate her story; ergo, believe her. Simple; all rape claimants are to be believed, making exoneration of even the most innocent defendant all but impossible. The point all along.