Feminist mono-braincelled thinking never produces the results they want. 'Gender is a social construct' was meant to prove that women should do everything that men can do and if we don't have 50/50 equity this is due to society sabotaging the efforts of women. And women need compensated for this. The fact that this theory* gave rise to t…
Feminist mono-braincelled thinking never produces the results they want. 'Gender is a social construct' was meant to prove that women should do everything that men can do and if we don't have 50/50 equity this is due to society sabotaging the efforts of women. And women need compensated for this. The fact that this theory* gave rise to trans-ideology which is making women's lives hell wasn't part of the plan. There probably wasn't a plan - as the question 'how can this possibly go wrong?' should be part of your plan.
Same with not charging false accusers with perjury. The idea is 'perjury charges will only encourage more genuine victims to not come forward for fear of being disbelieved.' There's no logic to this at all. It's just another emotionally abusive plea to let women off with lying. Logic would say that if you wanted women to be believed you would purge the system of as many lying women as possible, so the remaining ones would be believed. But no. We have a legal system that encourages the worst of women to lie. The more liars there are the harder it is to believe any one. I wonder how this can possibly go wrong?
*Theories are actually proven ideas, not propostions or hypothesis. I've used the word wrong, I know. Apologies to all real theories.
To be fair, it was John Money who got the gender ball rolling. But feminists picked up the ball and ran with it. But like the semi mythical invention of rugby.
I have to look into who this John Money character is. The world is filled with people coming up with bad ideas. Luckily 99.9% die at birth. As you mentioned there is a difference between coming up with an idea and demanding other people put it into practice.
Allowing women or in principle any person to lie in a court on the weak excuse of not wanting to discourage other "victims" from coming forward is a bad idea . How can we have confidence in the justice system?
Feminist mono-braincelled thinking never produces the results they want. 'Gender is a social construct' was meant to prove that women should do everything that men can do and if we don't have 50/50 equity this is due to society sabotaging the efforts of women. And women need compensated for this. The fact that this theory* gave rise to trans-ideology which is making women's lives hell wasn't part of the plan. There probably wasn't a plan - as the question 'how can this possibly go wrong?' should be part of your plan.
Same with not charging false accusers with perjury. The idea is 'perjury charges will only encourage more genuine victims to not come forward for fear of being disbelieved.' There's no logic to this at all. It's just another emotionally abusive plea to let women off with lying. Logic would say that if you wanted women to be believed you would purge the system of as many lying women as possible, so the remaining ones would be believed. But no. We have a legal system that encourages the worst of women to lie. The more liars there are the harder it is to believe any one. I wonder how this can possibly go wrong?
*Theories are actually proven ideas, not propostions or hypothesis. I've used the word wrong, I know. Apologies to all real theories.
To be fair, it was John Money who got the gender ball rolling. But feminists picked up the ball and ran with it. But like the semi mythical invention of rugby.
I have to look into who this John Money character is. The world is filled with people coming up with bad ideas. Luckily 99.9% die at birth. As you mentioned there is a difference between coming up with an idea and demanding other people put it into practice.
Allowing women or in principle any person to lie in a court on the weak excuse of not wanting to discourage other "victims" from coming forward is a bad idea . How can we have confidence in the justice system?