You are certainly right that most men don't dare speak out. I get that because the ones that do are ripped apart. Judges are probably in a different category here! But if a lot more men started to take the risk and ignore the flak, things would start to change.
You are certainly right that most men don't dare speak out. I get that because the ones that do are ripped apart. Judges are probably in a different category here! But if a lot more men started to take the risk and ignore the flak, things would start to change.
I heard that the International Mens Issues conference 2025 will be held in Sydney, this year it is in Budapest. This meeting would be a good place to address the fact that men don’t speak up in their own defence, and ways to help.
We could learn from other countries with a more aggressive attitude , like the French or Dutch farmers, the Canadian Truck drivers , sometimes you have to take the fight to the enemy .
I agree that judges are safer because they are almost impossible to sack, unlike politicians who are much more vulnerable. However, I do feel like a lot of women in workplaces etc. who are implementing some of the ESG-type agendas would back right off if otherwise-reasonable men they work with voiced their objections, but no-one ever says anything. We all just mutter privately and go along with it.
Right , women get it too easy , and in a bizarre way they would benefit more if they had to fight men for the top positions and power which is being given to them on a silver platter.
You are certainly right that most men don't dare speak out. I get that because the ones that do are ripped apart. Judges are probably in a different category here! But if a lot more men started to take the risk and ignore the flak, things would start to change.
I heard that the International Mens Issues conference 2025 will be held in Sydney, this year it is in Budapest. This meeting would be a good place to address the fact that men don’t speak up in their own defence, and ways to help.
We could learn from other countries with a more aggressive attitude , like the French or Dutch farmers, the Canadian Truck drivers , sometimes you have to take the fight to the enemy .
I agree that judges are safer because they are almost impossible to sack, unlike politicians who are much more vulnerable. However, I do feel like a lot of women in workplaces etc. who are implementing some of the ESG-type agendas would back right off if otherwise-reasonable men they work with voiced their objections, but no-one ever says anything. We all just mutter privately and go along with it.
Right , women get it too easy , and in a bizarre way they would benefit more if they had to fight men for the top positions and power which is being given to them on a silver platter.