Thanks for keeping tabs on the growth of the Feminazi state. As a father who had his children stolen by the Divorce Industrial Regime 20 years ago and subsequently have spent eight months at different intervals locked up as a result of trying to contact them, I can confirm everything you say.
The only thing I could see missing from your article is the fact that ""domestic violence" is now judged to be anything which displeases a woman. eg teasing, not putting the rubbish out etc etc. The meaning of the word violence has been changed for reasons of political expediency.
Unfortunately my interaction with this out of control monster hasn't finished.
About a decade ago I started stepping out with a divorced woman and we spent a lot of time together until about two years ago when we had a barney and I told her we were finished. We then communicated via text and email for the next 10 days, giving each other the benefit of a few brutal truths and were well on the way to reconciling when out of the blue, and Intervention Order was sort, along with a charge of assault.
Naturally in these politicized courts, I was found guilty and placed on a Community Order, of which an attendance at a feminist indoctrination session will be the finale next week.
However a mutual friend discovered after the sentence was handed down that the woman in question had been the recipient of abusive anonymous texts from Telstra phone boxes and wrongly imputed them to me, and that was the reason she sought the IO. Understandable I guess but the revelation was all too late for me. The culprit I'm sure is a very strange friend of mine as he has previous form.
To make matters worse, he sent me one, purportedly from her, saying she still lurrvved me. Like an idiot, I didn't think twice and started trying to contact her and have now been charged with countless ""breaches"" of said IO. (a similar thing happened six years ago but we managed to kiss and make up)
The upshot is at the age of 66 I'm seriously thinking of trying to disappear, no easy task in this overbearing surveillance state we're now belabouring under.
Basically I'm being charged for buying a newspaper (newsagent not far from her house) and attempting to contact another human being, but of course in these diabolical ""Family Violence" courts, we deal in euphemisms. Lawyers never say what needs to be said for fear of killing the golden goose. These Orders - straight out of the communist playbook - are such a wonderful revenue stream for them. It's cost me 12k thus far and plenty more if I decide to front up at my ""trial"".
This may be further grist to your mill and if so, feel free to use it.
All the best,
Jack
PS. One of the changes I've noticed is that 20 years ago when IO were dished out (no evidence of wrongdoing required) the wallopers would ring you and then deliver them to you personally. Nowadays they turn up announced - usually late at night 11-12pm - throw you in the back of the paddy wagon and drag you down to the local station to be grilled. You then have to make your own way home.
I think it's fair to say a silent coup has occurred in this country.
When men are being locked up in ""Family Violence"" courts for trying to see their judicially kidnapped children, or for saying hello to somebody, then you realize that we're talking about an unconscionable power grab, not violence at all. Blokes who've been sent to jail for sending their woman flowers in an attempt to mollify the harridans, are commonplace. The Law has been politicized and corrupted, thanks to the Feminazis and the judiciary too terrified of them not to comply. What we're talking about here is a fully blown Police State.
It is noticeable how the propaganda has been shamelessly cranked up during the last few days. It remains to be seen how many blameless men will be rounded up as a result.
Excellent article Bettina but frightening in its content. More power to any movement improving men’s lives whether in jails or in their daily lives against conniving, vicious women who have the support of feminists, media and gutless politicians.
The taboo topic is the number of offences that are committed by mentally ill people, Collins Street Melbourne, The Shopping centre stabbings, just to name a few.
Melaine Philips wrote and article "Killing in the Community" that documented the increase in murders by mentally ill people once Psychiatric Hospitals were closed down. Sadly I have not been able to find the article as it seems to have disappeared or the search engines deliberately do not find it.
Another incredible article Bettina. Truly frightening that the country is slowly but surely being transformed into a quasi totalitarian system with no regard for individual rights, not dissimilar to the one my immigrant parents fled from.
The risk of engaging in a relationship in this country and in these times is just eye-boggling
Excellent article. The sort of thing that you don't see in the mainstream media.
I fear however that this sort of excellent work is being badly overshadowed by the ongoing defense of Lehrmann. Bruce and Brittany are both proven liars, both are trouble. The whole "Poor Bruce" thing is tiresome and undermines your otherwise excellent advocacy. When you're in a hole, stop digging.
See big news today about Harvey Weinstein. His first rape conviction has been overturned due to irregularities in the way the case was conducted. Given that courts everywhere have been bending the rules to ensure more convictions, this is an important decision.
Hi Jamie, yes, the guy who wrote that, Steve, if you google him, you'll find that he caused mayhem at the time he worked at the Home Office and "blew the whistle" on the immigration practices of that time! I've been working with him a bit advocating for a "minister for men" in the UK. I videoed a "fringe meeting" at the conservative party conference for which Mike Bell had managed to bring an APPG (All party parliamentary group) together on the subject. My interest in the whole agenda, which brings me in to contact with Bettina's blog, stems from working with domestic abusers, both males and females and gays and lesbians, too. Numbers-wise over 28 years we've completed 36 hours of group work with just under 1300 men, and about 120 women, with just 2 gay men and 2 gay women amongst them. The "accredited work" which has to be to a "white male patriarchy agenda" has very demonstrably failed and been decommissioned - they failed to engage with the men - deliberately? ( I strongly suspect.) But there is a raft of research which pulls the radical feminist agenda apart on the subject. We, by contrast, have worked to an "emotional regulation" agenda. If one puts the interests of children, rather than women, first then that focus becomes very much clearer. You, Jamie, could, of course, live anywhere in the world but the very negative historical experiences of gay men, which tend to persist into today, have been very extreme in the UK. So the "victim" quality of gay men has been purely about prejudice, whereas I have not been aware of any particularly negative attitudes towards lesbians. As I understand it - and will probably be corrected - they were readily tolerated, whereas my long-dead, gay uncle had to be married and have a child to establish his "non-gay credentials". His daughter, my cousin, was gutted when, just before her death, her mother told her that her father had been gay. In many conferences I have been to, there have often been questions which female colleagues have been able to put which it would have been impossible for me to put. Equality ! (Of opportunity!) I was learning, yesterday, that ministers in the German Parliament have to be in equal numbers, male and female. That begins to explain why 3 of the last 4 defence ministers in Germany have been women, Van Der Leyen - moved to Europe - etc etc. Fortunately they now have a male minister, Pistorius, who is steadily getting things into shape, militarily, whilst Vlad begins to knock at the eastern doors of Europe! As my German father-in-law said 40 odd years ago: "the question is not if the Russian will come, but when!"
You would think that with the over-crowding of prisons/remand centres and the cost to the State, that quickly determining if an alleged perpertrator is guilty would be of the utmost importance. And if the alleged perpertrator is found innocent, then how about charging the instigator of the alleged crime?
The whole point of the law is to make business for itself. That's why you never hear lawyers arguing about the wickedness of these laws or their unconstitutionality. They're too much of a revenue provider. As for the jails, there are thousands employed in them and they and the prisoner transport industry dependent on a steady supply of ""clients"" for their livelihoods. I wouldn't be surprised if the transport and associated companies have been promised a certain quota of heads per year by government.
It would be worth (and one day, hopefully a Royal Commission into the whole DV industry will do so) investigating how many cases of domestic murders are provoked - I use the word advisedly - by ill-gotten or malicious accusations of domestic violence. Family lawyers or police who nudge women into making such accusations (e.g. for tactical reasons in a divorce contest for custody or the family home) may unwittingly be pushing up the domestic murder rate. The MSM's willingness to portray domestic violence as an exclusively male on female phenomenon, ignoring the female on male homicide and violence rate and particularly female on children crimes, abets the issue.
The "presumption of innocence" has its origins way back in the 12th or 13th centuries in England - about the same time as the Magna Carta was written- via the legal term "Habeas Corpus".
The latter term refers to the protection of a person perhaps wrongly jailed but without proper representation of a defence.
Back in those "good old days" things were terrible in the legal, judicial and jail conditions, however it is interesting that today we are arguing those early recognitions of individual liberty, it being one of the great risks we now face in modern society.
The timing of this article could not be better with the latest hysterical commentary from shock jocks about the already hopelessly politicised bail laws. The idea that 42% of prisons in NSW are taken up with accommodating innocent men on remand in appallingly inhumane conditions is as much an indictment on our society as the unfortunate woman who was allegedly killed by her ex-boyfriend in the past week. While the media has remained silent on the overcrowded remand system since the days when Jamie Partlic was turned into a quadriplegic by Gary Stokes while on remand in a notorious incident that occurred last century, it seems every time there is a tragic incident the media goes into overdrive about misleading violence statistics designed to hijack sensible debate. As has been shown over and over again, this is the absolute worst way to reform the legal system and the results of all this nonsense speak for themselves.
I agree Joe. It is just so disgusting that men are locked up on often dishonest statements from women. If the state was forced to provide good free advice from top tear firms to every man who was assaulted in jail, raped in jail, the politicians may realize some of the cost to society. Women jailed who lie to have innocent men punished. There are families of these men who are angry.
Are Aussie women finding it more difficult to get the attention of men? It would seem an understandable result similar to the effects of the me-too movement had here in the states. I think that the hot/crazy line needs to be shifted a bit to the left ....only half kidding.
Most Australian women have been brainwashed by feminism which has influenced and controlled the education systems and media for many decades . The result is women with big egos who see themselves as special just because they are women , they then complain that men don’t want them and is it any wonder.
Hi Tina,
Thanks for keeping tabs on the growth of the Feminazi state. As a father who had his children stolen by the Divorce Industrial Regime 20 years ago and subsequently have spent eight months at different intervals locked up as a result of trying to contact them, I can confirm everything you say.
The only thing I could see missing from your article is the fact that ""domestic violence" is now judged to be anything which displeases a woman. eg teasing, not putting the rubbish out etc etc. The meaning of the word violence has been changed for reasons of political expediency.
Unfortunately my interaction with this out of control monster hasn't finished.
About a decade ago I started stepping out with a divorced woman and we spent a lot of time together until about two years ago when we had a barney and I told her we were finished. We then communicated via text and email for the next 10 days, giving each other the benefit of a few brutal truths and were well on the way to reconciling when out of the blue, and Intervention Order was sort, along with a charge of assault.
Naturally in these politicized courts, I was found guilty and placed on a Community Order, of which an attendance at a feminist indoctrination session will be the finale next week.
However a mutual friend discovered after the sentence was handed down that the woman in question had been the recipient of abusive anonymous texts from Telstra phone boxes and wrongly imputed them to me, and that was the reason she sought the IO. Understandable I guess but the revelation was all too late for me. The culprit I'm sure is a very strange friend of mine as he has previous form.
To make matters worse, he sent me one, purportedly from her, saying she still lurrvved me. Like an idiot, I didn't think twice and started trying to contact her and have now been charged with countless ""breaches"" of said IO. (a similar thing happened six years ago but we managed to kiss and make up)
The upshot is at the age of 66 I'm seriously thinking of trying to disappear, no easy task in this overbearing surveillance state we're now belabouring under.
Basically I'm being charged for buying a newspaper (newsagent not far from her house) and attempting to contact another human being, but of course in these diabolical ""Family Violence" courts, we deal in euphemisms. Lawyers never say what needs to be said for fear of killing the golden goose. These Orders - straight out of the communist playbook - are such a wonderful revenue stream for them. It's cost me 12k thus far and plenty more if I decide to front up at my ""trial"".
This may be further grist to your mill and if so, feel free to use it.
All the best,
Jack
PS. One of the changes I've noticed is that 20 years ago when IO were dished out (no evidence of wrongdoing required) the wallopers would ring you and then deliver them to you personally. Nowadays they turn up announced - usually late at night 11-12pm - throw you in the back of the paddy wagon and drag you down to the local station to be grilled. You then have to make your own way home.
I think it's fair to say a silent coup has occurred in this country.
When men are being locked up in ""Family Violence"" courts for trying to see their judicially kidnapped children, or for saying hello to somebody, then you realize that we're talking about an unconscionable power grab, not violence at all. Blokes who've been sent to jail for sending their woman flowers in an attempt to mollify the harridans, are commonplace. The Law has been politicized and corrupted, thanks to the Feminazis and the judiciary too terrified of them not to comply. What we're talking about here is a fully blown Police State.
It is noticeable how the propaganda has been shamelessly cranked up during the last few days. It remains to be seen how many blameless men will be rounded up as a result.
Excellent article Bettina but frightening in its content. More power to any movement improving men’s lives whether in jails or in their daily lives against conniving, vicious women who have the support of feminists, media and gutless politicians.
The taboo topic is the number of offences that are committed by mentally ill people, Collins Street Melbourne, The Shopping centre stabbings, just to name a few.
Melaine Philips wrote and article "Killing in the Community" that documented the increase in murders by mentally ill people once Psychiatric Hospitals were closed down. Sadly I have not been able to find the article as it seems to have disappeared or the search engines deliberately do not find it.
Here it is, under another name: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/columnists/article-420307/Forget-killers-rights-What-protection-innocent-public.html
I searched a quote from https://www.nzcpr.com/test-post-354/
Thanks for that, sadly the article needs to be read by more people, but it won't be.
Another incredible article Bettina. Truly frightening that the country is slowly but surely being transformed into a quasi totalitarian system with no regard for individual rights, not dissimilar to the one my immigrant parents fled from.
The risk of engaging in a relationship in this country and in these times is just eye-boggling
Excellent article. The sort of thing that you don't see in the mainstream media.
I fear however that this sort of excellent work is being badly overshadowed by the ongoing defense of Lehrmann. Bruce and Brittany are both proven liars, both are trouble. The whole "Poor Bruce" thing is tiresome and undermines your otherwise excellent advocacy. When you're in a hole, stop digging.
See big news today about Harvey Weinstein. His first rape conviction has been overturned due to irregularities in the way the case was conducted. Given that courts everywhere have been bending the rules to ensure more convictions, this is an important decision.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04-26/harvey-weinstein-rape-conviction-overturned-court-explainer/103771118
Hi Jamie, yes, the guy who wrote that, Steve, if you google him, you'll find that he caused mayhem at the time he worked at the Home Office and "blew the whistle" on the immigration practices of that time! I've been working with him a bit advocating for a "minister for men" in the UK. I videoed a "fringe meeting" at the conservative party conference for which Mike Bell had managed to bring an APPG (All party parliamentary group) together on the subject. My interest in the whole agenda, which brings me in to contact with Bettina's blog, stems from working with domestic abusers, both males and females and gays and lesbians, too. Numbers-wise over 28 years we've completed 36 hours of group work with just under 1300 men, and about 120 women, with just 2 gay men and 2 gay women amongst them. The "accredited work" which has to be to a "white male patriarchy agenda" has very demonstrably failed and been decommissioned - they failed to engage with the men - deliberately? ( I strongly suspect.) But there is a raft of research which pulls the radical feminist agenda apart on the subject. We, by contrast, have worked to an "emotional regulation" agenda. If one puts the interests of children, rather than women, first then that focus becomes very much clearer. You, Jamie, could, of course, live anywhere in the world but the very negative historical experiences of gay men, which tend to persist into today, have been very extreme in the UK. So the "victim" quality of gay men has been purely about prejudice, whereas I have not been aware of any particularly negative attitudes towards lesbians. As I understand it - and will probably be corrected - they were readily tolerated, whereas my long-dead, gay uncle had to be married and have a child to establish his "non-gay credentials". His daughter, my cousin, was gutted when, just before her death, her mother told her that her father had been gay. In many conferences I have been to, there have often been questions which female colleagues have been able to put which it would have been impossible for me to put. Equality ! (Of opportunity!) I was learning, yesterday, that ministers in the German Parliament have to be in equal numbers, male and female. That begins to explain why 3 of the last 4 defence ministers in Germany have been women, Van Der Leyen - moved to Europe - etc etc. Fortunately they now have a male minister, Pistorius, who is steadily getting things into shape, militarily, whilst Vlad begins to knock at the eastern doors of Europe! As my German father-in-law said 40 odd years ago: "the question is not if the Russian will come, but when!"
Goodness what a word salad. Why can't people express themselves simply and clearly these days?
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Benjamin Franklin
You would think that with the over-crowding of prisons/remand centres and the cost to the State, that quickly determining if an alleged perpertrator is guilty would be of the utmost importance. And if the alleged perpertrator is found innocent, then how about charging the instigator of the alleged crime?
The whole point of the law is to make business for itself. That's why you never hear lawyers arguing about the wickedness of these laws or their unconstitutionality. They're too much of a revenue provider. As for the jails, there are thousands employed in them and they and the prisoner transport industry dependent on a steady supply of ""clients"" for their livelihoods. I wouldn't be surprised if the transport and associated companies have been promised a certain quota of heads per year by government.
It would be worth (and one day, hopefully a Royal Commission into the whole DV industry will do so) investigating how many cases of domestic murders are provoked - I use the word advisedly - by ill-gotten or malicious accusations of domestic violence. Family lawyers or police who nudge women into making such accusations (e.g. for tactical reasons in a divorce contest for custody or the family home) may unwittingly be pushing up the domestic murder rate. The MSM's willingness to portray domestic violence as an exclusively male on female phenomenon, ignoring the female on male homicide and violence rate and particularly female on children crimes, abets the issue.
The "presumption of innocence" has its origins way back in the 12th or 13th centuries in England - about the same time as the Magna Carta was written- via the legal term "Habeas Corpus".
The latter term refers to the protection of a person perhaps wrongly jailed but without proper representation of a defence.
Back in those "good old days" things were terrible in the legal, judicial and jail conditions, however it is interesting that today we are arguing those early recognitions of individual liberty, it being one of the great risks we now face in modern society.
The timing of this article could not be better with the latest hysterical commentary from shock jocks about the already hopelessly politicised bail laws. The idea that 42% of prisons in NSW are taken up with accommodating innocent men on remand in appallingly inhumane conditions is as much an indictment on our society as the unfortunate woman who was allegedly killed by her ex-boyfriend in the past week. While the media has remained silent on the overcrowded remand system since the days when Jamie Partlic was turned into a quadriplegic by Gary Stokes while on remand in a notorious incident that occurred last century, it seems every time there is a tragic incident the media goes into overdrive about misleading violence statistics designed to hijack sensible debate. As has been shown over and over again, this is the absolute worst way to reform the legal system and the results of all this nonsense speak for themselves.
I agree Joe. It is just so disgusting that men are locked up on often dishonest statements from women. If the state was forced to provide good free advice from top tear firms to every man who was assaulted in jail, raped in jail, the politicians may realize some of the cost to society. Women jailed who lie to have innocent men punished. There are families of these men who are angry.
Imprison false accusers without bail would sort it out
The world has gone mad. A touch on the shoulder can be construed as sexual assault. I believe some women would even charge a eunuch with rape.
Are Aussie women finding it more difficult to get the attention of men? It would seem an understandable result similar to the effects of the me-too movement had here in the states. I think that the hot/crazy line needs to be shifted a bit to the left ....only half kidding.
Most Australian women have been brainwashed by feminism which has influenced and controlled the education systems and media for many decades . The result is women with big egos who see themselves as special just because they are women , they then complain that men don’t want them and is it any wonder.