One of the reasons I stopped watching any news on any TV station (other than SBS occasionally) was the feminist bile masquerading as creditable news...
One of the reasons I stopped watching any news on any TV station (other than SBS occasionally) was the feminist bile masquerading as creditable news...
If Bettina can unravel the details of that survey why can't our bloody prime Minister and his cabinet? Instead of groveling and confessing shame at the rampant misogyny taking place in his toxic parliament the moron should have been calling out the survey for the sham it was and underlining the fact that over 60 % of the bullying was perpetuated by women even though they were a minority demographic.
If we ever had a conservative politician with the guts to take on the feminist man hating bigots he or she might be surprised by the support they get.
I have written to so many politicians and yes I have had a few responses, but they always deflect or ignore the pertinent facts I use in my letter/email and trot out the party line- Thank you for your expression of concern for male victims of domestic violence, we share your concern for all victims but we understand that women are the overwhelming majority of victim of this shocking abuse and men are overwhelmingly the perpetrators.
It's just another lie but that is as good as it gets.
I even pre-empt their response by saying men are the overwhelming victims of suicide, homelessness and workplace fatalities but none of these issues is presented as a gendered problem and all of the language around them is very gender neutral. Why don't we do the same with family violence?
As a female and having worked for over 40 years I can honestly say women were the bullies. Men I worked for were always kind and respectful. I am on the side of the guys, keep fighting these bully women
Great to hear from a woman defending men! There are heaps of us that feel the same way but unfortunately we are drowned out by the tiny group of noisy feminists.
Between 1985 and 1995 I conducted a personal, informal survey among a reasonable amount of women who had been in the workplace for at least twenty years. I asked them two questions: (1) who would you prefer to have for a boss- a man or a woman? In every case, and without pause, the women preferred a man. I then asked them (2) why do you prefer a man? Again the answer was unanimous, and was always words to the effect that you always got more consideration from a man. Of course, I wouldn't claim any social science status for my informal survey, but it's no worse, and probably more accurate than the junk social science that the psychotic sisterhood has been assailing us with for decades. Indeed, I love the title of Jenkins' report: 'Set the Standard'. It's certainly that. The same low, junk standard we now know so well.
I suppose I should have, by way of clarification and even-handedness, stated that the reason why I had a starting point of at least twenty years in the workforce; and really, the more years the better as far as I was concerned, was for the women to make a decision based on long experience. I assumed that the women would no doubt have had, to some degree, the misfortune of reporting to a male boss who was probably a bully or a pig (no disrespect to actual pigs intended); but weighing the totality of experience of male and female bosses in the balance, I wanted to know on which side a woman would come down.
Mark, understand information and logic aren't prerequisites for party pre-selection by any party and would probably not be seen as a favourable attributes to have in a puppet.... which is one of the reasons why NoMo got to where he is today... it also doesn't appear to be a prerequisite for staffers either.
One of the reasons I stopped watching any news on any TV station (other than SBS occasionally) was the feminist bile masquerading as creditable news...
That also applies to most television series, new films, books etc. All woke, filled with hateful men. So sad
If Bettina can unravel the details of that survey why can't our bloody prime Minister and his cabinet? Instead of groveling and confessing shame at the rampant misogyny taking place in his toxic parliament the moron should have been calling out the survey for the sham it was and underlining the fact that over 60 % of the bullying was perpetuated by women even though they were a minority demographic.
If we ever had a conservative politician with the guts to take on the feminist man hating bigots he or she might be surprised by the support they get.
Why don't you send the PM a note and ask him precisely that?
I have written to so many politicians and yes I have had a few responses, but they always deflect or ignore the pertinent facts I use in my letter/email and trot out the party line- Thank you for your expression of concern for male victims of domestic violence, we share your concern for all victims but we understand that women are the overwhelming majority of victim of this shocking abuse and men are overwhelmingly the perpetrators.
It's just another lie but that is as good as it gets.
I even pre-empt their response by saying men are the overwhelming victims of suicide, homelessness and workplace fatalities but none of these issues is presented as a gendered problem and all of the language around them is very gender neutral. Why don't we do the same with family violence?
They simply ignore my question.
I may give it a go.
Thanks for all you do, Bettina. You have guts.
As a female and having worked for over 40 years I can honestly say women were the bullies. Men I worked for were always kind and respectful. I am on the side of the guys, keep fighting these bully women
Great to hear from a woman defending men! There are heaps of us that feel the same way but unfortunately we are drowned out by the tiny group of noisy feminists.
Between 1985 and 1995 I conducted a personal, informal survey among a reasonable amount of women who had been in the workplace for at least twenty years. I asked them two questions: (1) who would you prefer to have for a boss- a man or a woman? In every case, and without pause, the women preferred a man. I then asked them (2) why do you prefer a man? Again the answer was unanimous, and was always words to the effect that you always got more consideration from a man. Of course, I wouldn't claim any social science status for my informal survey, but it's no worse, and probably more accurate than the junk social science that the psychotic sisterhood has been assailing us with for decades. Indeed, I love the title of Jenkins' report: 'Set the Standard'. It's certainly that. The same low, junk standard we now know so well.
I suppose I should have, by way of clarification and even-handedness, stated that the reason why I had a starting point of at least twenty years in the workforce; and really, the more years the better as far as I was concerned, was for the women to make a decision based on long experience. I assumed that the women would no doubt have had, to some degree, the misfortune of reporting to a male boss who was probably a bully or a pig (no disrespect to actual pigs intended); but weighing the totality of experience of male and female bosses in the balance, I wanted to know on which side a woman would come down.
Mark, understand information and logic aren't prerequisites for party pre-selection by any party and would probably not be seen as a favourable attributes to have in a puppet.... which is one of the reasons why NoMo got to where he is today... it also doesn't appear to be a prerequisite for staffers either.