Sure, when Prime Minister sees no other way but to treat feminist establishment as an essential corporation, necessary for your re-election, you have to play their games.
Enthusiastic consent laws, turning every sexual encounter for men into a trap, are only the beginning.
Feminists will never stop hoarding their "rights", i.e. mechani…
Sure, when Prime Minister sees no other way but to treat feminist establishment as an essential corporation, necessary for your re-election, you have to play their games.
Enthusiastic consent laws, turning every sexual encounter for men into a trap, are only the beginning.
Feminists will never stop hoarding their "rights", i.e. mechanisms for power play, while any elected representative of the people cannot set him or herself from the feminist establishment. Few exceptions, like Pauline Hanson, are alas, the exceptions. They will be constantly derided in mass media.
But surely conservative politicians should realise the mass media is captured and don't represent the people likely to vote for them. It is just madness to go to such efforts to try to win over women who would never vote for a conservative party in their lives!
Their planning is never too far beyond the next election cycle, for one good reason - to have any solid reasons, sanity and (conservative) convictions are not helpful to get re-elected. Not in a current culture anyway.
Well, until quiet Australians stop watching the TV that sells them all these sentimental stories of poor rape victims, nothing will change.
Australia was a colony with great shortage of women for way too long. Every woman is so precious, it is treated like a princess even if she is spoiled rotten brat, or utterly insane hag in essence.
Who knows what they are thinking right now? I've noticed many women criticising the Higgins and Tame dramatics on threads which are not necessarily conservative or anti-feminist. It seems that we are still allowed to think and state the bleeding obvious.
I think you are being unfair to feminists. In the same way religions are pilloried for the actions of those at the extreme.
I have always seen myself as a feminist. I grew up as the only child of a working single mum and a strong working grandmother. I respected them and knew that it was important for them to be treated equally.
I don't agree with the new positing of women as victims, especially so when the smaller perceived slight is called out as abuse.
The older generation of feminists doesn't support the anti-male policies being promoted by this mob. Feminism was once about equality, fair treatment for all. The new feminists are all about advantaging women at the expense of men.
Posting women as victims is but one part of the powerplay. Next move is to turn around and use all the might of the media, legislative and executive machinery of the state to compensate for this "weakness", to smash the offending bug into complete nothingness. Third part is to watch and enjoy the morality play, presiding over it like a Great Inquisitor over the spectacle of burning heretic. Pure pleasure! Moral orgasm!
It happens every day in family courts, by the way.
Very interesting, Igor. Please excuse me while I interject, there have been problems in the Adelaide Baptist Church network, infiltrated by an organisation known as Women of Worth, who are wagging their fingers of conceit at the helpless masses, working methodically top-down, recruiting big names and only big names (to mass bully any detractors) and placing surveillance cameras in the church foyer to "Keep the little ones safe". Sick joke IMHO.
The church are not standing up to them. Safety is moot, power is everything to them. I wrote to Bettina recently (hope you don't mind, Bettina), as Joseph Bloggs about how churches are being bashed by feminists who take advantage of their kindness. People don't want to rock the boat. They are loving and welcoming people. Rock that boat! They are treating them like "potential pedophiles", and treating them like they are convictions!
My point: Courts of law and due process are not even involved. Thanks Igor.
Rick there are many factions within feminism today with the far left radical Marxist feminists having the loudest (and ugliest) voices. They need to get a new name to more accurately reflect their views and not commandeer what many of us understand by feminism.
I trust it is up to the feminists to set things straight between themselves and publicly expel and shame those who are obviously crooked or deluded and out of touch with reality.
But the "sisterhood" always prefers to keep unity in the face of the common enemy, - i.e. the horrible Patriarchy that Australia is, all these overworked, uncouth beery daddies they rarely see, but hate the guts of.
Sure, when Prime Minister sees no other way but to treat feminist establishment as an essential corporation, necessary for your re-election, you have to play their games.
Enthusiastic consent laws, turning every sexual encounter for men into a trap, are only the beginning.
Feminists will never stop hoarding their "rights", i.e. mechanisms for power play, while any elected representative of the people cannot set him or herself from the feminist establishment. Few exceptions, like Pauline Hanson, are alas, the exceptions. They will be constantly derided in mass media.
But surely conservative politicians should realise the mass media is captured and don't represent the people likely to vote for them. It is just madness to go to such efforts to try to win over women who would never vote for a conservative party in their lives!
Their planning is never too far beyond the next election cycle, for one good reason - to have any solid reasons, sanity and (conservative) convictions are not helpful to get re-elected. Not in a current culture anyway.
Well, the polls were wrong last time. The quiet Australians spoke out. Who knows what they are thinking right now.
Well, until quiet Australians stop watching the TV that sells them all these sentimental stories of poor rape victims, nothing will change.
Australia was a colony with great shortage of women for way too long. Every woman is so precious, it is treated like a princess even if she is spoiled rotten brat, or utterly insane hag in essence.
Who knows what they are thinking right now? I've noticed many women criticising the Higgins and Tame dramatics on threads which are not necessarily conservative or anti-feminist. It seems that we are still allowed to think and state the bleeding obvious.
I think you are being unfair to feminists. In the same way religions are pilloried for the actions of those at the extreme.
I have always seen myself as a feminist. I grew up as the only child of a working single mum and a strong working grandmother. I respected them and knew that it was important for them to be treated equally.
I don't agree with the new positing of women as victims, especially so when the smaller perceived slight is called out as abuse.
The older generation of feminists doesn't support the anti-male policies being promoted by this mob. Feminism was once about equality, fair treatment for all. The new feminists are all about advantaging women at the expense of men.
One more fresh example of the same hypocrisy.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/christian-pastor-trends-over-tweet-on-female-modesty-that-outrages-feminists-he-poses-question-in-response-to-backlash
Posting women as victims is but one part of the powerplay. Next move is to turn around and use all the might of the media, legislative and executive machinery of the state to compensate for this "weakness", to smash the offending bug into complete nothingness. Third part is to watch and enjoy the morality play, presiding over it like a Great Inquisitor over the spectacle of burning heretic. Pure pleasure! Moral orgasm!
It happens every day in family courts, by the way.
Very interesting, Igor. Please excuse me while I interject, there have been problems in the Adelaide Baptist Church network, infiltrated by an organisation known as Women of Worth, who are wagging their fingers of conceit at the helpless masses, working methodically top-down, recruiting big names and only big names (to mass bully any detractors) and placing surveillance cameras in the church foyer to "Keep the little ones safe". Sick joke IMHO.
The church are not standing up to them. Safety is moot, power is everything to them. I wrote to Bettina recently (hope you don't mind, Bettina), as Joseph Bloggs about how churches are being bashed by feminists who take advantage of their kindness. People don't want to rock the boat. They are loving and welcoming people. Rock that boat! They are treating them like "potential pedophiles", and treating them like they are convictions!
My point: Courts of law and due process are not even involved. Thanks Igor.
Rick there are many factions within feminism today with the far left radical Marxist feminists having the loudest (and ugliest) voices. They need to get a new name to more accurately reflect their views and not commandeer what many of us understand by feminism.
I trust it is up to the feminists to set things straight between themselves and publicly expel and shame those who are obviously crooked or deluded and out of touch with reality.
But the "sisterhood" always prefers to keep unity in the face of the common enemy, - i.e. the horrible Patriarchy that Australia is, all these overworked, uncouth beery daddies they rarely see, but hate the guts of.