And robust research that has been rigourously peer reviewed over the past 3 or 4 decades finds that 75% (+/- 5%) of domestic violence is reciprocal ~ i.e. both partners are perpetrators.
Further, the peer reviewed research that was commissioned by the UK Home Office to support the "committee" (all were militant feminists except for one to…
And robust research that has been rigourously peer reviewed over the past 3 or 4 decades finds that 75% (+/- 5%) of domestic violence is reciprocal ~ i.e. both partners are perpetrators.
Further, the peer reviewed research that was commissioned by the UK Home Office to support the "committee" (all were militant feminists except for one token male) in their recommendations to the UK government, was rejected by this militant feminist committee, becuase 1. The research findings surprised them and 2. The research findings did not support the recommendations they intended to make to the UK government on (latest female privilegeand "fem-splaning") "coercive control". The commissioned research found that there is gender symmetry arround the perpetration on domestic violence and coercive control and that there is
gender symmetry arround the victimisation from domestic violence and coercive control; not what militant feminists want ro hear, especially those in AU like Qld AG fentiman (still don't know why a toxic feminist has "man" in her name)who shriill "only men..." obviously this woman doesn't intend to yave sons
Ironically this flawed UK legislation is being used /touted throughout AU and the rest of western world to support the introduction of draconian "coercive control" laws were only a male is a perpetrator and a female can profiteer from her claimed victimhood
So Queensland has a woman AG, another example of the recent and rapid increase in women in power.
There should be nothing wrong with that but you could assume that a lot of these women have strong feminist sentiments.
They are mostly of an age where the feminist influence would have affected them in education and the media .
Also the way women behave in big organisations is a worry . They can be very "catty", alliances are made and dissenters are frozen out of the "clique", backbiting , character assassination etc, far worse than men.
These laws coming up will pass if the feminist influence has affected enough of these new women in power.
As you say, these things are happening in all Western countries and that deserves a closer look, is this part of a bigger picture?, a "war on the West" in the words of Douglas Murray.
And robust research that has been rigourously peer reviewed over the past 3 or 4 decades finds that 75% (+/- 5%) of domestic violence is reciprocal ~ i.e. both partners are perpetrators.
Further, the peer reviewed research that was commissioned by the UK Home Office to support the "committee" (all were militant feminists except for one token male) in their recommendations to the UK government, was rejected by this militant feminist committee, becuase 1. The research findings surprised them and 2. The research findings did not support the recommendations they intended to make to the UK government on (latest female privilegeand "fem-splaning") "coercive control". The commissioned research found that there is gender symmetry arround the perpetration on domestic violence and coercive control and that there is
gender symmetry arround the victimisation from domestic violence and coercive control; not what militant feminists want ro hear, especially those in AU like Qld AG fentiman (still don't know why a toxic feminist has "man" in her name)who shriill "only men..." obviously this woman doesn't intend to yave sons
Ironically this flawed UK legislation is being used /touted throughout AU and the rest of western world to support the introduction of draconian "coercive control" laws were only a male is a perpetrator and a female can profiteer from her claimed victimhood
So Queensland has a woman AG, another example of the recent and rapid increase in women in power.
There should be nothing wrong with that but you could assume that a lot of these women have strong feminist sentiments.
They are mostly of an age where the feminist influence would have affected them in education and the media .
Also the way women behave in big organisations is a worry . They can be very "catty", alliances are made and dissenters are frozen out of the "clique", backbiting , character assassination etc, far worse than men.
These laws coming up will pass if the feminist influence has affected enough of these new women in power.
As you say, these things are happening in all Western countries and that deserves a closer look, is this part of a bigger picture?, a "war on the West" in the words of Douglas Murray.